Back to Vala Reference Manual
Generics
Generic programming is a way of defining that something is applicable to a variety of potential types, without having to know these types before hand. The classic example would be a collection such as a list, which can be trivially customised to contain any type of data elements. Generics allow a Vala programmer to have these customisations done automatically.
Some of these are possible, which?
class Wrapper < T > : Object { ... }
new Wrapper < Object > ( ) ;
BUG: class StringWrapper : Wrapper < string > ( ) { ... }
FAIL: class WrapperWrapper < Wrapper < T > > : Object { ... }
FAIL: new WrapperWrapper < Wrapper < Object > > ( ) ;
interface IWrapper < T > { ... }
class ImpWrapper1 < T > : Object, IWrapper < T > { ... }
BUG: class ImpWrapper2 : Object, IWrapper < string > { ... }
Generics declaration
Some of the syntax could be best placed in the class/interface/struct pages, but that might overcomplicate them...
In class declaration - In struct declaration - In interface declaration - In base class declaration - In implemented interfaces declaration - In prerequesite class/interface declaration.
Declaration with type parameters introduces new types into that scope, identified by names given in declaration, e.g. T.
qualified-type-name-with-generic:
qualified-class-name-with-generic
qualified-interface-name-with-generic
qualified-struct-name-with-generic
qualified-class-name-with-generic:
[ qualified-namespace-name . ] class-name type-parameters
qualified-interface-name-with-generic:
[ qualified-namespace-name . ] interface-name type-parameters
qualified-struct-name-with-generic:
[ qualified-namespace-name . ] struct-name type-parameters
type-parameters:
< generic-clause >
generic-clause:
type-identifier [ , generic-clause ]
qualified-type-name [ , generic-clause ]
type-identifier:
identifier
type-identifier will be the type-name for the parameterised type.
Deal is: in the class/interface/struct sections, replace qualified-*-name with qualified-*-name-with-generic.
Instantiation
Only explanation here? Syntax should go with variable declaration statement?
When using generic for a type-name, only type-names can be used as type-parameters, not identifiers. NB. in scope of generic class, T etc. is a real type-name.
Examples
Demonstrating...
using GLib;
public interface With < T > {
public abstract void sett(T t);
public abstract T gett();
}
public class One : Object, With < int > {
public int t;
public void sett(int t) {
this.t = t;
}
public int gett() {
return t;
}
}
public class Two < T, U > : Object, With < T > {
public T t;
public void sett(T t) {
this.t = t;
}
public T gett() {
return t;
}
public U u;
}
public class Test : GLib.Object {
public static void main(string[] args) {
var o = new One ();
o.sett(5);
stdout.printf("%d\n", o.t);
var t = new Two < int, double? > ();
t.sett(5);
stdout.printf("%d\n", t.t);
t.u = 5.0f;
stdout.printf("%f\n", t.u);
}
}