This site has been retired. For up to date information, see handbook.gnome.org or gitlab.gnome.org.


[Home] [TitleIndex] [WordIndex

Feedback about GNOME from users.

Please file bugs on https://bugzilla.gnome.org to let the appropriate programmers know about the annoyances, and link to it from this page.

1. Likes

2. Dislikes

2.1. General Interface

I would like everyone to think for a minute. Should Gnome really go off on a tangent? Most individuals want dependable computers and operating systems. Those of us who use Linux are willing to tinker with things to make them work as desired. From my own experience with Gnome, making adjustments is not the problem. Gnome is the problem with all the changes. Following Ubuntu who is following a 6% market share that Apple is now losing, is not the way to go. Solid software which is stable allows users to do those things they wish to do is the solution to follow. Go back to v2 and build from there. If folks want cute give it to them as an added feature, not a mandate. By mandating, Gnome loses. The goal of computers is to do work. Not trying to figure out how to undo silly changes made by a key component of a computer system. For me I left Ubuntu, Apple, Microsoft because the software wanted to argue with the work that I got the computer to do in the first place. The news is full of key people leaving Gnome and kicking the dust of Gnome off their feet. Now is the time to return to the Gnome roots and then create flexibility with that system, not problems. As for me, if I have more stunts pulled when I do upgrades because Gnome snuck something else into the equation that makes me stop and spend time to undo the changes, I can permanently solve the problem by eliminating the problem, Gnome. Go back to your bones and work from there. Stability with flexibility is the answer, not someone's warp view of the world. It is an uncanny, extremely weird experience I have with software. Just as I am about to right a check to help support the software, that software goes off the deep end and goes in another direction that I would pick as the worst direction to go. Gnome's contribution went to the Michigan Food Bank instead. I do send the contribution, it only gets diverted to something else. The less I have to fight with software, means there are more things I can do, some of it can be promotion of software, but not if I have to spend all this time fixing things that should not have been broken by the software. I am so far behind, about three years because of arguing with "good" software.

Here is an update. I had some computer problems installing a wifi, during the process of getting the wifi working, Gnome 3.2 was downloaded without my permission onto my computer. If I wanted something that behaved like a bad rendition of an iMac computer, I would use the $3,000 piece of junk that I use as a TV. Yes, an iMac.

This whole system is designed to please the developers, not the users. There are too many "can't dos", not because of technical issues,these problems I am referencing are strictly attitude. I want things on my desktop, I want to have back my kill switch that I put on the bar on top. Maybe it's there, I can't find it. And why in the (**&&&* should I have go looking for things in a poorly designed package that I didn't want in the first place. Yes, I am enraged! When I have time, I will have to try to figure out how to undo all the mistakes that Gnome made to my computer. If I can't I will go elsewhere, pretty dog-gone fast, too! Someone wanted to know which Linux I use, it is Debian. I didn't change the fonts I used, I don't know if Gnome did this, but I didn't change to a serif font.

Each person has their likes and dislikes. I found gnome to be going backwards starting with v.3. I have now switched to Mate as the DE (Desktop Environment.) It is the fork of Gnome before Gnome broke Gnome. I have installed Mate on about 15 Debian Squeeze and Wheezy machines. Nothing is perfect but if you do not like the direction Gnome is trying to take you look at Mate. http://mate-desktop.org/, For something right out of the box, it already has Gnome beat for most things. I am now a happy Linuxer again.

2.2. Help system

2.3. Networking

2.4. Printing

2.5. Scanning

I think what people with scanners are missing is a simple, integrated application the eases the scanning process. I think Xsane is just not it. While it definitely let's us do, what we want it is not simple enough. Such a program should be available under Applications/Graphics/Scan Image. It would be nice if this application would be able to understand the buttons for scanning or mailing on some scanners. The user should be given a very simple interface and the possibility to send the image (this should lead to automatically reduce the size per default) or to open with GIMP, or maybe to import into Abiword or GNOME. I came to this conclusion after failing to support my father via telephone in the scanning process. I also did not find any application at gnomefiles.org. So maybe this should be build into GNOME itself? -- ThiloPfennig 2006-02-16 15:52:36

2.6. Mousing

2.7. Development/Bugs

2.8. Miscellaneous

3. Suggestions

[Discussion on new ideas for GNOME 3 moved to ThreePointZero ('interaction' section)]

Why to have only workspaces, I propose workcylinder... More information at http://parasiilonmac.blogspot.com/2005/10/extreme-desktop-performance.html

4. Meta Comments

Things about this page, this wiki, etc.



2024-10-23 10:59